Public Employee Gain Reason for Higher Ed Loss

David Crane's picture
Special Advisor to Governor Schwarzenegger for Jobs & Economic Growth

This Thanksgiving I gave special thanks for the University of California and California State University systems. In California, jobs and economic growth are inextricably linked to the well being of higher education. With their 33 campuses and 670,000 students, UC and CSU play central roles in providing opportunity to students, preparing California’s workforce, and powering our diverse and entrepreneurial economic growth. Put simply, a healthy California economy requires a healthy university system.

Yet, despite its essential importance, higher education’s share of the state budget has been reduced by 30% over the past thirty years, largely to make room for more compensation for state government employees. In the last ten years, cash expenses relating to state employee compensation (just for direct employees only) have more than doubled and now total more than $20 billion per year, in excess of three times what the state provides to higher education. On an accrual basis it's more like four times.

By far the largest boost in state employee compensation took place in 1999, when the Legislature passed and Governor Davis signed a bill known as SB 400 that boosted pension benefits for state employees by more than 25% and made those boosts retroactive, lifting the cost even higher. Had the boosts been adequately pre-funded there would be no impact on higher education’s funding.

But they weren’t. Instead, because unfunded pension promises are functionally no different than debt promises, SB 400 was simply the equivalent of the state issuing tens of billions of dollars of new and unfunded debt. Since the General Fund is on the hook for all such debt, sadly that meant that inevitably billions would be diverted from higher education and other unprotected General Fund programs to meet the pension promises. No single event ever harmed our university system more, and to make matters worse, for decades California had already been underfunding pension promises generally, condemning higher education and other programs to even more pressure.

This year alone, meeting past underfunded pension promises to state employees extracted $3.3 billion from general and special funds, equal to almost half of what the state contributes in total to UC and CSU. Next year nearly $5 billion will be extracted. Worse, through aggressive accounting of the type GM employed to hide the full extent of its pension costs until it was too late, neither figure even captures the full cost of unfunded promises. In addition, payments for another unfunded form of deferred compensation (post-retirement healthcare for state employees) are now diverting more than $1 billion per year from the state budget, leaving even less for our universities and other unprotected programs.

As we all know, UC and CSU already have been forced to cut back services and raise tuition, but unfortunately they’ve seen only the tip of the iceberg that SB 400 set in their path. This is because the legislation irrevocably increased lifetime pensions not only for the state employees in place in 1999 but also for every employee hired since then, so budgets for the universities and other important programs will be under growing pressure. As a result, the only way to help university funding over time is to reduce other general fund spending, including the sizes of pensions promised to newly hired employees. That’s why Governor Schwarzenegger has proposed rolling back pension sizes for new employees to the levels in place before SB 400 and constraining GM-like underfunding of pension promises.

Legislators regularly proclaim their support for higher education but the math makes it clear that if they're unwilling to reform state employee compensation to make room for more university funding, it’s hard to take them seriously. To protect and grow our universities we must start by reforming pensions for new state employees.

By next Thanksgiving let’s hope our universities and students have something like that to celebrate.

Funding for Higher Education

Mr. Dave Crane: You are also a State Employee. However, you are not a Civil Service Employee. Civil Service Employees must prove their compentance and maintain their level of work to be and remain a Civil Service Employee. You, only have to ...! You use statistics to "support" your statement. There is no direct cause and effect in Public Policy Decisions. No one budget item is the cause of the State's fiscal condition. Without qualified, dedicated and hardworking Civil Service Employees, California would not have the excellent level of service from the State that it currently enjoys. Your statements placing the blame on the cost of State Employees is in the same category of blarney as statements made by your boss - "State Employees are PIGS at the trough." "The prison guards belong on the other side of the bars" You parrot your boss quite well and we all know how you got your position. How brown is your nose? Many factors contribute to the current fiscal situation. Any freshman public policy student could tell you that. You make a direct cause and effect argument that is not logical. More research and less pontification would be a first step to make an informed judgement. What are your qualifications anyway?

Decades of underfunding for higher ed

The slide in state funding for California higher education started long before SB400.

Perhaps

Perhaps the people of the state should look at the high wages paid to some of the UC administration. There are several UC chancellors who are making over $400,000.00 year. Linda Katehi at UC Davis gets free housing, car allowance and received $50,000.00 to move to Ca. All in addition to her 400,000.00 year salary. While most of these people would make this much and more in the private sector as top people in their fields. Why should the state be causing basically a brain drain by having top researchers become administrators? Can we not find top academics to administrate UC universities that will settle for less? Especially when housing and other perks are being offered? The UC system just raised tuition fees mid year and I can not help but wonder how many gifted students will face the possibility of setting their education aside, while top salary administrators still feed at the public trough.

Quoting ..."To protect and

Quoting ..."To protect and grow our universities we must start by reforming pensions for new state employees. " No ! Changing it only for NEW employees will do SQUAT for 20-30 years until they retire. WE MUST reduce pensions for FUTURE years of service for CURRENT employees. If we don't, we'll be broke before any benefits from changing it only for new employees materialize. And for those (i.e., the Civil Servants) who say "but we were promised" (Blah, Blah, Blah) .... all I have to say is that Private Sector Taxpayers pay for the vast bulk of your pensions, and pension formulas changes for Future years of service for CURRENT Private Sector employees are the NORM, NOT the exception. Civil Servants are NOT special and should NOT be guaranteed pensions and benefits far in excess of those that pay their way. Lastly, it is is RARE Private Sector retiree that gets ANY subsidy towards their healthcare costs, so exactly WHY are we paying for this benefit for Civil Servants? They pay exactly nothing in many cases. Retiree healthcare needs to be ELIMINATED for everyone not ALREADY eligible to retire now. And for this latter group, they should pay AT LEAST 50% of the annual cost (and more if they worked for less than a full 30 year career).

RE: "Special Advisor to the

RE: "Special Advisor to the Governor for Jobs and Economic Growth," does this qualify Mr. Crane in any specific way? Sounds more like more anti-government employee rhetoric which serves to divert and deflect any real responsibility. You hate government employees? Fine. Get rid of them. But live with the mess you make. I guess you'd have to as you'd be fresh out of scape goats. No doubt you'd move on to illegal immigrants which your boss currently seems to coddle. Your boss has governed as if he was center ring in the biggest circus in town. It's time to quit the blame game and take some responsibility for your own governance...or the lack thereof.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.