The End for Bass? Villines?

Joe Mathews's picture
Journalist and Irvine senior fellow at the New America Foundation. He is co-author of California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It (UC Press, 2010).

Three weeks to the special election, and defeat looks likely for Props 1A-1E. The governor and legislators who cut the budget deal that includes the measures have talked in the broadest, scariest terms about what happens if the measures fail – the state could go bankrupt! Or off a cliff! Or it goes bankrupt as it goes off the cliff! (Does the long fall erase the debt?).

But the first casualties of defeat likely would be political, not economic. It’s hard for me to see the Democratic and Republican leaders in the Assembly surviving such a defeat. Both Karen Bass and Mike Villines have put their prestige and credibility on the line in making the deal, and defending it. In doing so, they’ve taken a big political risk, and for a good reason. Without a deal, the state’s cash crunch would have hurt not only the government but also the economy.

But when you take a risk and you lose, there’s a price to pay. Bass and Villines crossed key interest groups (SEIU and some other unions for Bass, the anti-tax folks for Villines) and couldn’t even get their own parties to endorse the deal. If the measures go down, another budget deal will have to be negotiated. And, having made a deal that was rejected by voters and their own parties, Bass and Villines would not have the credibility to cut another deal. Each would be wise to resign.

By the same logic, Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg could be in trouble as well. But unlike Bass and Villines, who are termed out at the end of next year, Steinberg is in his first term in the Senate. He’d be more likely to fight any attempt to oust him, and it’s not clear there will be an attempt. He draws on a far deeper well of good will in his caucus than Bass or Villines at this point. He probably survives.

And what about Gov. Schwarzenegger? He’s not quitting. And it’s too late in his term to bother with a recall. He’ll not only have to accept the defeat but also he’ll have to reckon with the carnage. As the lone pine in the political desert that is Sacramento, he’ll get all the blame for this, even though he’s spent much of his term trying to find a politically viable way out of the state’s budget mess. Any fiscal disaster that ensues is likely to define his governorship.

That’s why you can expect Gov. Schwarzenegger to go on the air waves if the polls don’t improve for these measures. And why not? He’s got everything to lose politically. If this compromise is going to go down to defeat, he might as well go down swinging -- and give California voters advance warning of the consequences of voting “no.”

So Do I Get a Mea Culpa from Hogwash?

Now that Villines is out. We'll see about Bass. I think she's strong in many ways, but the great advantage she may have in sticking around is that times are so bad, no one else may really want the job. As for my time in Sacramento, I don't live there but visit an average of once a week. As a reporter, I wish I could be there more. As a father, not so much.

Villines - Bass

Joe, great blog. I agree with your view points completely. This budget debacle was a major political risk for both party leaders in both Houses. That's the problem...they brokered a deal considering political ramifications. Sacramento has to stop looking at issues, starting with the budget, from a political vantage point. We need to get away from partisan politics, political swaggering and back to public benefit. Tear down the budget...start from zero and re-vamp every level of government. Policy driven goals, generated from sparked debates, should drive the vision for California's future beginning with definition of public benefit. Once defined, precious taxdollars can be budgeted to those programs and services which are proven to protect public safety and enhance public benefit. Costly, bureaucratic layers will dissolve to reveal what California needs most...smaller government driven by free market principles which gets out of the way of people who can help themselves and helps those unable to help themselves to become independent.

Hogwash

Joe, you need a pay a visit to Sacramento once in awhile so you understand what you are writing about. Bass and Villines will stay put for several reasons. In Villines case, Chuck DeVore already made a run from the right. It flopped. Villines is a smart leader who knows how to keep his caucus together and deal with the Governor. There isn't a strong challenger among the small group of GOP'rs who could possibly oust him. Bass is even stronger. She's ruled by consensus and they have all been in this together. They are not about to send a newbie back to the bargaining table. You also forget that Bass led the effort that padded the Democratic margin in the Assembly, and she has plenty of IOU's to collect. In both cases, do you think a challenger actually would want to deal with the aftermath of what happens here? Inheriting the mess would be a disaster; they'd be much smarter to wait it out until both Bass and Villines step down from their leadership posts on schedule.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.