Fix the Public Sector Retirement System!

Marcia Fritz's picture
President of the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility

For several years I’ve warned that we can’t afford pension enhancements that have been granted to California’s state and local government workers since 1999. That’s when the Legislature passed SB 400 to increase benefits and lower retirement ages for state workers and permitted local agencies to do the same. Cities, counties, water districts, fire districts – all -- have felt pressure to ramp up benefits to keep employees from bolting to other districts.

To bring sanity back to government employee compensation, the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility proposes uniform retirement benefits for NEW workers that closely resemble defined benefits earned by federal workers. Not only would uniform benefits stop the bidding wars, we estimate California’s governments will save at least $500 billion in pension costs over the next 30 years. We felt that would be more than enough to keep budgets balanced.

We were wrong.

Even if our economy recovers, changes in benefits for new workers may help budgets at first, but won’t keep pension funds from falling off a financial cliff in the meantime. We have to do more.

Pension funds everywhere have lost over 30% of their value since last June—to unhealthy levels. And we are seeing a spike in new retirements that are draining pension funds at the worst possible time. Today over 5,000 CalPERS retirees receive annual pensions that exceed $100,000. This doesn’t count retirees in 80 other plans, including LA, San Francisco, 1937 Act counties, and the UC system. The majority of retirees in the “$100,000 Club” are public safety workers—and they routinely net more in retirement than in wages. The Club is growing by hundreds each month as these 50-something baby boomers retire. Government retirees are becoming the new idle rich in California while workers in the private sector are watching their wealth disappear.

Active workers and retirees have the most to lose if changes aren’t made soon to ensure their pension funds remain solvent. Two possible solutions: suspend the accrual of retirement service year credits for today’s workers, and suspend the annual COLA increases that are normally added to retirees’ pensions. These changes should be temporary, at least until the market recovers and pension funds return to healthier levels.

Retirees shouldn’t suffer because prices for gas, housing, and retail prices are below last year’s prices. Workers will actually receive higher net paychecks because they won’t contribute anything toward their pensions in years credits are suspended. And if older workers put off retirement for just a few more years, it gives pension funds everywhere the breathing room they need to recover. Everyone wins.

COLA

Before you make the hasty decision to lop off the COLA for CalPers retirees please be aware the $100K+ retirees are from an elite section. Many retirees have pensions below $40K without health benefits. They rely on the annual COLA, which barely keeps up with inflation, to make payments for their own health care as well as other living expenses. It is rather dangerous to run around declaring the sky is falling without some rational thought.

To: This woman is either..

Yes, and stopping AIG bonuses would violate their contracts too. Better to let the economy go into a depression and for Cal Pers to declare bankruptcy and default on all pensions in a few years. We can't cut those 90% of the highest salary for life for those fifty something firefighters now, can we?

Pension shortfaLL

These suggestions are a good start ..... but DON'T go far enough. For all CURRENT employees, the grossly overgenerous Defined Benefit plan needs to be PERMANENTLY ended with the benefits frozen at the current level..... no future service credits, no increase due to future salary increases, no COLAS PERIOD....... the TAXPAYER has ALREADY been ripped off ENOUGH. For FUTURE years of service, give em a modest 401k PERIOD. ****************** It is wrong to tax people (Private Sector workers) who make market wages in order to subsidize people (Civil Servants) who, by virtue of their union clout, have been able to negotiate wages and benefits well above the prevailing market. Civil Servants are the energizer bunny's of greed and the self-serving, vote-selling, contribution-soliciting, politicians are their enablers.

Great resource:

This woman is either

This woman is either intentionally misleading or just badly informed. She seems to think that the state was in the forefront of expanding retirement benefits, and that it allowed local agencies to follow. The reverse is actually true - the state was losing employees to local agencies with more generous plans. More seriously, she advocates for changes that would illegally impair the contract between the state and its existing employees, by suspending the accrual of service credits and cost of living adjustments. This is simply irresponsible, coming from someone who purports to be an expert in these matters.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.